The challengers have been submitted. Place your vote:
- nabob
- pizza
- kumquat
- muffaletta
- raconteur
- sizzle
- kerfuffle
- squelch
- callipygian
- schadenfreude
- serendipities
- eleemosynary
- dork
Monday, February 12, 2007
Muffaletta Raconteur
Surprise, surprise! In the interest of making things over-complicated, let's actually do this thing all official-like. (I know we said there would be no rules, but precisely because we said there would be no rules, making rules is the unruliest thing we could do. Tricky, huh? We're the Outback Steakhouse of the blogosphere.)
The challengers have been submitted. Place your vote:
The challengers have been submitted. Place your vote:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
And I'm going with "squelch", by the way.
ReplyDeleteMy choice has to be "nabob." "Eleemosynary" is a lot of fun to say, but who wants to think about almshouses? As for "callipygian" - that's naughty!
ReplyDeleteTroika.
ReplyDeleteDamn!
kumquat
ReplyDeleteWhat? No Battle Royale?
ReplyDeleteI vote for "szxcwdo" (if it's "word verification", it must be a word!)
Squelch is it
ReplyDeleteWe're making this up as we go. I'm thinking a sort of augmented or Extreme Battle Royale. Two words duking it out is quite nice, but thirteen is awesome! The last word standing then goes on to battle a fresh batch of contenders. Or maybe a lion. Or some Christians. We'll see.
ReplyDeleteSince I am a rather simple person(and I don't know what some of those other fancy words mean), I will choose the simplest word--dork. It has such a nice ring to it and is quite expressive!
ReplyDeleteSizzle
ReplyDeleteI stand by squelch. As a transitive verb or a sound effect.
ReplyDeleteIf a pendulum pit-wesson oil battle is necessary, will Zena be the referee?
ReplyDeleteIn that case I'm with squelch as well. I don't trust those foreign-sounding words.
ReplyDeleteFor the next round, how about rictus?
ReplyDelete